Giulio Perego vs Gabriele Maria Noce Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 03 Sep at 01:17 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Perego vs G. Maria Noce

ITA
2
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
2
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Perego 2 - 0 Noce
They have played 4 sets in total, with Giulio Perego winning 4 and Gabriele Maria Noce winning 0. The last match between Giulio Perego and Gabriele Maria Noce was at the M15 Bologna, 03-09-2025, Round: R1, Surface: Clay, with Giulio Perego getting the victory 6-3 6-3.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Perego | 2 |
Noce | 0 |
Last 2 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Bologna(09-03-25)
(Q3) M15 Segrate(07-22-25)
G. Perego vs G. M. Noce H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
59.21% (45-31) | Career Total W/L | 47.97% (177-192) |
2 | Clay | 0 |
2 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Perego vs G. M. Noce Match Preview:
- Perego outperforms Noce in second serve points, securing 42.96% compared to Noce's 40.48%. How likely is this to influence the match outcome? Quite significant, given its predictive accuracy.
- Noce edges out Perego in recent return game statistics, winning 46.98% of opponents' second serve points compared to Perego's 45.14%.
- A closer look at first serve return stats shows Perego slightly better at 31.89% over Noce's 30.26%.
- Under pressure, Noce is more effective, saving 52.07% of breakpoints compared to Perego's 49.43%.
- Performance history indicates a stronger track record for Perego, winning 57.14% of matches in the last year, whereas Noce has managed 42.31%.
- Both players excel on clay; however, Perego has a higher win rate at 62% compared to Noce's 50%.
- Surveying the competition level, Perego outshines on the ITF circuit with a slightly higher win ratio of 57.14%. Noce, in contrast, has won 43.75% in similar events.
- Their only direct encounter tilted in Perego's favor, with a 2-0 record in both matches and sets won.
- In extreme pressure situations such as tiebreaks, Perego stands out, having won the solitary tiebreak they played.
- When scrutinizing opponent quality over the past year, Perego faced stiffer competition, with an average opponent rank of 49.29 compared to Noce's 276.25.
- While Noce might possess an edge in deciding set performance over the year, winning 46%, Perego’s lower 38% indicates room for improvement.
- Perego demonstrates superior breakpoint conversion, seizing 38.6% of opportunities, whereas Noce has converted 29.58%.
Editorial Prediction (September 3, 2025, UTC):
In assessing the upcoming match, Perego's established edge in several statistical categories, including second serve and breakpoint conversion rates, suggests a strong advantage.
Noce's marginally better recent return games and performance under pressure offer a slight chance and could play a significant role if leveraged effectively during critical moments.
Given Perego's past success over Noce and superior performance metrics, especially on clay, it's likely that Perego will emerge victorious in their upcoming encounter.
Giulio Perego vs Gabriele Maria Noce Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Perego vs G. M. Noce H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 0 |
25 | Games Won | 12 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 1 |
0:42:45 | Average Match Time | 0:42:45 |
67% (30/45) | 1st Serve % | 58% (28/48) |
77% (23/30) | 1st Serve Win % | 54% (15/28) |
73% (11/15) | 2nd Serve Win % | 60% (12/20) |
50% (4/8) | Break Pts Won % | 100% (1/1) |
44% (21/48) | Return Points Win % | 24% (11/45) |
100% (2/2) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/2) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/2) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Perego Recent Matches Played
G. M. Noce Recent Matches Played

G. Perego vs G. M. Noce Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
59.21% (45/31) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.97% (177/192) |
58.66% (105/74) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.47% (394/436) |
53.09% (945/835) | Games Win/Loss | 49.38% (3817/3913) |
50.00% (7/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.21% (35/46) |
61.29% (38/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 50.00% (141/141) |
0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 16.67% (1/5) |
0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
156 | Aces Total | 537 |
0.13 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
110 | Total Double Faults | 803 |
1:12:46 | Average Match Time | 1:16:58 |
282.97 | Average Opponent Rank | 380.03 |
64% (2123/3322) | 1st Serve % | 61% (10423/17019) |
66% (1404/2123) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (6583/10423) |
52% (620/1199) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3112/6596) |
43% (143/329) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (682/1635) |
40% (1330/3316) | Return Points Win % | 40% (6685/16610) |
0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 18.18% (2/9) |
59.21% (45/31) | Futures W/L | 48.88% (175/183) |
59% (44/75) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (172/363) |
59% (13/22) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (33/76) |
43% (12/28) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (53/99) |
83% (47/39) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (169/146) |
15% (47/7) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (169/23) |
17% (29/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (199/27) |