Giulio Perego vs Gabriele Maria Noce Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 27 Nov at 12:16 PM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
G. Perego vs G. Maria Noce

ITA
3
Win
Played
0
Win

ITA
3
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Perego 3 - 0 Noce
They have played 6 sets in total, with Giulio Perego winning 6 and Gabriele Maria Noce winning 0. The last match between Giulio Perego and Gabriele Maria Noce was at the M25 Heraklion, 27-11-2025, Round: R2, Surface: Hard, with Giulio Perego getting the victory 6-4 7-6(7).
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Perego | 3 |
| Noce | 0 |
Last 3 H2H Matches:
(R2) M25 Heraklion(11-27-25)
(R1) M15 Bologna(09-03-25)
(Q3) M15 Segrate(07-22-25)
G. Perego vs G. M. Noce H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 61.11% (55-35) | Career Total W/L | 47.72% (178-195) |
| 2 | Clay | 0 |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 3 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
G. Perego vs G. M. Noce Match Preview:
- In recent performance, Giulio Perego edges out Gabriele Maria Noce by winning 44.77% of points on his second serve, compared to Noce’s 42.55%.
- On return games, Noce performs better on opponents' second serves, with a 48.57% win rate over Perego’s 46.56%. Can this be Noce's advantage?
- Examining their return stats on first serves, Noce again leads with 31.39%, while Perego follows with 29.80%.
- Under pressure, Gabriele Maria Noce has shown more resilience, saving 53.09% of breakpoints compared to Giulio Perego’s 48.11%.
- Over the last year, Perego's win rate is significantly higher at 64.86%, compared to Noce's 37.78%.
- Surface preferences indicate that Giulio Perego performs best on Hard, with a 62% win rate, whereas Noce prefers Clay with the same 62% win rate.
- In tournament levels, both have primarily played in the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K, but Perego boasts a stronger win record of 64.86% against Noce’s 40.00%.
- Perego has dominated their head-to-head encounters, winning both matches without dropping a set against Noce.
- On the quality of opponents, Perego has faced higher-ranked players, with an average opponent ranking of 173.14 versus Noce's 307.8.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Noce has a better win percentage of 50%, compared to Perego’s 30%.
- Perego excels at converting breakpoints, with a 40.71% success rate, significantly higher than Noce’s 29.63%.
Editorial Prediction (November 27, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Giulio Perego and Gabriele Maria Noce presents an intriguing clash of styles and strengths.
Perego displays superior second serve performance and breakpoint conversion, which could provide a critical edge in the match.
Despite Noce's resilience under pressure and preference for Clay, Perego's overall win rate and head-to-head dominance suggest he is better equipped for this matchup.
Considering the overall statistics and previous encounters, Giulio Perego emerges as the likely winner in their next match.
Giulio Perego vs Gabriele Maria Noce Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
G. Perego vs G. M. Noce H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 6 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 38 | Games Won | 22 |
| 6 | Aces (Total) | 3 |
| 2 | Total Double Faults | 5 |
| 1:18:0 | Average Match Time | 1:18:0 |
| 67% (88/131) | 1st Serve % | 63% (81/129) |
| 69% (61/88) | 1st Serve Win % | 59% (48/81) |
| 60% (26/43) | 2nd Serve Win % | 52% (25/48) |
| 41% (7/17) | Break Pts Won % | 25% (3/12) |
| 43% (56/129) | Return Points Win % | 34% (44/131) |
| 100% (3/3) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/3) |
| 100% (3/3) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/3) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/3) |
Recent Performance Stats
G. Perego Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QF | L | 1-6 6-4 6-2 | ||
R2 | W | 6-4 7-6(7) | ||
R1 | W | 7-5 7-6(1) | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | W | 6-1 7-5 | ||
G. M. Noce Recent Matches Played
| OPPONENT | RESULT | SCORE | H2H | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 | L | 6-4 7-6(7) | ||
R1 | W | 6-2 6-1 | ||
R1 | L | 6-7(2) 7-6(6) 6-4 | ||
R1 | L | 6-4 6-2 | ||
R2 | L | 6-2 6-2 | ||

G. Perego vs G. M. Noce Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 61.11% (55/35) | YTD Win/Loss | 47.72% (178/195) |
| 60.29% (126/83) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.32% (397/442) |
| 53.63% (1100/951) | Games Win/Loss | 49.37% (3862/3960) |
| 60.71% (17/11) | Hard Win/Loss | 43.37% (36/47) |
| 61.29% (38/24) | Clay Win/Loss | 49.82% (141/142) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 14.29% (1/6) |
| 0.18 | Aces Per Game | 0.14 |
| 176 | Aces Total | 551 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.21 |
| 123 | Total Double Faults | 812 |
| 1:11:41 | Average Match Time | 1:17:16 |
| 280.8 | Average Opponent Rank | 385.23 |
| 65% (2503/3880) | 1st Serve % | 61% (10573/17252) |
| 66% (1640/2503) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (6683/10573) |
| 51% (697/1377) | 2nd Serve Win % | 47% (3151/6679) |
| 44% (173/394) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 42% (692/1661) |
| 41% (1571/3873) | Return Points Win % | 40% (6790/16849) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 18.18% (2/9) |
| 61.11% (55/35) | Futures W/L | 48.62% (176/186) |
| 61% (54/89) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (173/367) |
| 63% (15/24) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (34/79) |
| 43% (13/30) | Deciding Set Win % | 53% (53/100) |
| 84% (58/49) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 86% (171/147) |
| 14% (58/8) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 14% (171/24) |
| 16% (32/5) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 13% (201/27) |
Other Tennis Predictions Today
Tennis Previews & Betting Tips

Anhelina Kalinina vs Elsa Jacquemot Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 14th December 2025 Best Bets

Anna-Lena Friedsam vs Elsa Jacquemot Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 13th December 2025 Best Bets

Cristina Bucsa vs Anhelina Kalinina Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 13th December 2025 Best Bets

Anna Siskova vs Elsa Jacquemot Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets

Cristina Bucsa vs Antonia Ruzic Prediction – WTA Open BLS de Limoges – 12th December 2025 Best Bets
